When the world's at stake,
go beyond the headlines.

National security. For insiders. By insiders.

National security. For insiders. By insiders.

Join War on the Rocks and gain access to content trusted by policymakers, military leaders, and strategic thinkers worldwide.

The CNO is Wrong When He Says 7-Month Deployments are “Achievable and Sustainable”

October 23, 2014
The CNO is Wrong When He Says 7-Month Deployments are “Achievable and Sustainable”
The CNO is Wrong When He Says 7-Month Deployments are “Achievable and Sustainable”

The CNO is Wrong When He Says 7-Month Deployments are “Achievable and Sustainable”

Bryan McGrath
October 23, 2014

The six month standard adhered to during the late Cold War and after is now a thing of the past, a victim of too small a fleet spread across too large a number of requirements.  Deployment length has been inching up for over a decade, tracking inversely with the size of the fleet, and the news is replete with stories like the one I cited above, in which the CARL VINSON Strike Group was deploying on a scheduled ten-month deployment.

Which brings us to yesterday’s Navy Times story in which the CNO stated during an All Hands Call that lengthy eight-month deployments are no longer sustainable, and seven-month deployments are achievable

Read the entire article at Information Dissemination. 

 

Bryan McGrath is the Managing Director of The FerryBridge Group LLC, a defense consultancy, and the Assistant Director of the Hudson Center for American Seapower. 

DoD photo by Petty Officer 3rd Class Paul J. Perkins, U.S. Navy.

Warcast
Get the Briefing from Those Who've Been There
Subscribe for sharp analysis and grounded insights from warriors, diplomats, and scholars.