When the world's at stake,
go beyond the headlines.

Welcome to The Adversarial. Every other week, we’ll provide you with expert analysis on America’s greatest challengers: China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, and jihadists. Read more below.***HizballahHizballah is facing the most complicated quandary since its July 2006 war with Israel. Despite calculated attacks, which are so far limited to Israeli military and communications targets, Hizballah’s strength is becoming its weakness — damned if it escalates, and damned if it doesn’t. The repercussions will be severe either way.The group has used the threat of its weapons as a deterrence against Israel, but Hizballah leadership also knows that their missiles — mainly the precision-guided missiles — will lose their value once they are launched. The threat will be eliminated, and it won’t be easy to restock. The group will be exposed to a devastating war.They would have preferred to avoid this moment of expectation — their supporters’ expectations for a grand and effective military response against Israel, and Hamas’ expectation for the “united front,” a promise that Hizballah and its Iranian sponsors have been repeating for months. While the “united front” scenario could ease the pressure on Hamas and prove Iran’s support to Gaza, it could lead to an open-ended regional war that no one wants, especially the Iranian regime.Today, Hizballah’s job is to protect the Iranian regime, not to support Hamas and the Palestinian people. Iran still needs the Hizballah card until its calculations shift, but it has become clear that Hizballah’s core narrative — the resistance rhetoric and the Palestinian cause — is fading for the sake of Iran’s interests and protection.Hizballah’s narrative, legitimacy, and even its weapons are at stake. If it cannot use its missiles now — when the war is at a very tense crossroad — to protect the Palestinians and defeat Israel, then what’s the purpose