In its first unclassified report on the subject in six years, the Office of Naval Intelligence depicts a powerful trajectory for China’s maritime forces. Titled “The PLA Navy: New Capabilities and Missions for the 21st Century,” the document and accompanying videos also cover the China Coast Guard—precisely the right approach, since the world’s largest blue water civil maritime fleet serves as “China’s Second Navy” and is on the front lines of island and maritime “rights protection” in the East and South China Seas. This focus on both the PLA Navy (PLAN) and the China Coast Guard is also especially appropriate given their role as the principal institutions charged with furthering regional sovereignty claims. The PLAN is also responsible for safeguarding Chinese interests much farther afield, and is gradually developing power projection capabilities to do so.
Looking towards 2020, the Office of Naval Intelligence sees China’s maritime forces on a trajectory of major improvement through hardware acquisition and accrual of operational proficiency. Chinese shipbuilding capabilities and resources allow both forces to replace old ships with new, far more capable ones. Last year alone, China’s navy laid, launched, or commissioned more than 60 vessels; the report expects a similar figure for 2015. More naval ships emerged from Chinese shipyards than from those of any other country in 2013 and 2014. The Office of Naval Intelligence expects China to lead in naval ship launching in 2015 and 2016 as well.
Chinese naval development remains more a quality improvement swap than a Soviet-style numerical buildup. PLAN ships include 26 destroyers, 52 frigates, 20 corvettes, 85 missile patrol craft, 56 amphibious vessels, 42 mine warfare ships, more than 50 major auxiliaries, and more than 400 minor auxiliaries. Beyond the numbers, though, what is most noteworthy is (1) the increasing number of vessels with multi-mission capabilities and their ability to operate both near to and far from China, and (2) growing numbers of specialized ships. Examples of geographic versatility include four-and-counting Yuzhao-class landing platform docks. They can support South China Sea island seizures and potentially even overseas expeditionary warfare.
In other revelations, the Office of Naval Intelligence explains that China can deploy heretofore publicly-unknown remote-controllable Wonang-class inshore minesweepers. China has four Dongdiao-class intelligence collection ships, which support growing surveillance operations in the Western Pacific. Three cutting-edge Dalao-class submarine rescue ships augment Chinese undersea warfare ability, which is relatively strong in the proximate waters that China cares most about. Likewise relevant to the East and South China Seas: twenty Jiangdao-class patrol corvettes in China’s fleet, with 10-40 additional hulls anticipated. The PLAN is also introducing UAVs. The Camcopter S-100 UAV has already been deployed, with a variety of indigenous systems likely to follow soon.
In the most groundbreaking single piece of information in the report, a U.S. government source has confirmed for the first time that Chinese ships and submarines have deployed the potent new-generation supersonic YJ-18 anti-ship cruise missile. Previously designated the CH-SS-NX-13 by the Department of Defense, it is apparently a copy of the 3M54E Klub (SS-N-27B export variant), with which Russian Kilo-class 636M subs are equipped. Like the Klub, the sea-skimming YJ-18’s high speed and terminal trajectory make it extremely difficult for ships’ air defense to thwart.
While most PLAN growth is primarily qualitative, the China Coast Guard is undergoing both a qualitative and a quantitative buildup. Over last decade, it received 100 new large patrol ships, patrol combatants and other craft, and auxiliary ships. Between the beginning of 2012 and the end of 2015, the report projects, the China Coast Guard will have added more than 30 large patrol ships and more than 20 patrol combatants—an overall hull increase of 25%. No other Coast Guard in the world is remotely close to that rate of growth.
And China already boasts the world’s largest blue water coast guard fleet. Compared to its maritime neighbors, the numbers are grossly in Beijing’s favor. China has more Coast Guard ships than Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and Philippines combined (China’s smaller neighbors are in another civil maritime category entirely: the minor leagues). While the Japan Coast Guard is extremely competent, it is already behind quantitatively and the gap will likely only grow.
To ensure that these hardware advantages can be translated into overall capabilities gains, however, the PLAN must continue to improve its training, coordination, and jointness. To truly master long-range precision strike weapons that it emphasizes in the hopes of deterring—and if necessary defeating—U.S. intervention, China must maintain awareness over a tremendous swath of ocean and airspace. The China Coast Guard faces less lofty operational objectives, but must continue to consolidate and organize itself effectively, no small task given its swelling ranks and the large number of new ships it needs to integrate.
If Beijing can continue on its present maritime trajectory, its neighbors and the United States are in for substantial challenges. Chinese sources frequently invoke “three million square kilometers of blue territory,” which equate to approximately 90% of the major waters within the First Island Chain (Bohai Gulf, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, and South China Sea). Already, China is engaged in massive island construction in the South China Sea, likely to give its maritime forces a better set of outposts from which to uphold and extend its claims there. There are numerous flashpoints in both the East and South China Seas, with frequent and deliberate vessel collisions during the Sino-Vietnamese Haiyang Shiyou 981 standoff in 2014 particularly worrying. The Office of Naval Intelligence judges that the clash “could easily have escalated into a military conflict.”
China is also becoming more active in distant seas. The report concludes that carriers, ballistic missile submarines and possibly large-deck amphibious ships will transform PLAN operations and further increase its international visibility: “in the next decade, China will complete its transition…to a navy capable of multiple missions around the world.” The question is to what extent Beijing will be able to reconcile a posture that pressures its neighbors in waters close to home, while seeking to protect growing interests and be seen as a global leader further afield.
Andrew S. Erickson is an Associate Professor in the Naval War College’s China Maritime Studies Institute and an Associate in Research at Harvard’s Fairbank Center for Chinese Studies. He blogs at www.andrewerickson.com.


“Chinese naval development remains more a quality improvement swap than a Soviet-style numerical buildup. PLAN ships include 26 destroyers, 52 frigates, 20 corvettes, 85 missile patrol craft, 56 amphibious vessels, 42 mine warfare ships, more than 50 major auxiliaries, and more than 400 minor auxiliaries.”
Quality? Looks more like they chose quantity over quality like everything else both China and the old Soviet Union.
Put another way when rich Chinese are flying to Japan to buy stuff like toilet seats you know something’s not right. While working in Siberia 15 years ago I often wondered if the USSR had collapsed because they didn’t have a single qualified plumber in the whole damn country… they could put up tens of thousands of Khrushchyovka apartment buildings, but not one toilet that ever flushed right.
So what scenario does the Office of Naval Intelligence have in mind if China falls into severe Japan-type deflation and burns through a significant amount of it’s $3 trillion catching falling knives while try to desperately support their falling currency?
And lastly if China were to attack Vietnam would Russia then attack China (as nearly happened in the late ’70s)?
WELL PUT! I could not agree more and was just about to post a similar response.
Difficult to say with regard to Vietnam, though I think you rightly identify them as the most likely target of an overt PRC bid for lebensraum/rally the population behind the CCP, as their economy continues to meltdown. I’ve yet to see a single scenario from anyone regarding this or any critical thinking whatsoever.
It is truly disingenuous to not call this a numerical build-up, with all the Third Reich-ish ambitions this implies.
@ T Dot
With Krazy Kim Jong Un heading to Moscow to visit Putler next month I also can’t help imagine a scenario involving China where North Korea starts something along the DMZ and then when the Generals of the PLA and the boys at the CCP refuse to back them up as they once did long ago in 1950 North Korea suddenly turns on China and lashes out at them.
People always think the DPRK and the PRC are two peas in pod, but I think you would have to entertain scenarios where they would be just as likely to hit Beijing as Seoul or Tokyo. What do the Krazy Kim’s care they could always bug out to somewhere in Siberia under Putler’s protection with all their loot if shit hit the fan so to say and leave their brainwashed people holding the bag.
Secondly concerning North Korea people underestimate the links they have to missile and nuclear weapon’s programs in Tehran. Whenever Pyongyang launches something Tehran sends observers and vice versa; also the reactor being built out in the Syrian desert that the Israeli’s hit in 2007 was being built by North Koreans with some Iranians hanging around. Likely Russia was well aware of what there boy Bashar was doing there too.
The Russia-Vietnam alliance I spoke of the other day vis-à-vis China is interesting and increasingly reawakening as Hanoi feels threatened. And not just from the North as some of those Khmer Rouge Maoist types are still running much of the show in Cambodia with democratic job titles behind a puppet king. Also Hanoi is supposed to be signing up to join Putler’s Eurasian Economic Union later this year.
The dynamics are changing as alliances subtly shift all over the place. And yet more than ever before our people in Washington suffer from a lack of strategic imagination.
China has been military country all its history. And its naval history is mostly looks like USSR.
Just check
http://merelinc.com/chapters/understanding-soviet-naval-developments