Is the Russian Navy about to collapse? In a recent article on War is Boring, David Axe made this argument largely based on data from my recent articles on the Russian shipbuilding program and the Russian Navy’s priorities. While the information I provided is sound, Axe’s overall interpretation is not.
The Russian Navy is investing in a time-phased recapitalization of its navy over the next 20 years. Submarines are the first phase, already well under way, followed by smaller surface combatants, then increased amphibious capabilities. The navy is letting recapitalization of cruisers and destroyers slip into the next decade. As such, the availability of large combat ships will decrease in the near term but begin to increase in the medium to long term.
The Russian Navy has historically had four main missions: 1) strategic deterrence, 2) coastal defense, 3) protection of sea lanes of communication, and 4) out-of-area deployment. Under Admiral Gorshkov’s leadership in the late Soviet period, it consistently built up the deployment mission while retaining the primacy of the others. During the immediate post-Soviet period, the Russian Navy largely collapsed. The vast majority of its combat ships were rendered inoperable and a large number were scrapped. In addition, lack of financing meant that the remaining operable ships and submarines rarely deployed in the period from 1994 to 2005.
[widgets_on_pages id=2]
When the Russian government resumed significant financing of naval procurement in recent years, naval planners understood that they could not rebuild the entire capacity of the Navy at the same time. The strategic deterrence mission remained primary, and the development and construction of new types of nuclear submarines (both ballistic missile and attack submarines) and submarine launched ballistic missiles proceeded with great speed once funding was increased (though the introduction of new Borei class ballistic missile submarines was delayed by problems with the Bulava missile).
As for the conventional naval force, the Russian Navy has decided (quite rationally) to focus on rebuilding its coastal defense mission first and foremost. It is building a fair number of highly capable smaller ships in the current rearmament program (i.e. through 2020) that will allow it to fully carry out this mission. The corollary of this choice is that building capabilities for the blue water/expeditionary mission has taken a back seat for now. This means that over the next five to ten years, the ability of the Russian Navy to deploy on long range missions will decline somewhat, as the remaining Soviet-era large ships age and become less reliable (with some perhaps being retired). But this is a short-term problem for them. In the medium to long term, the Russian Navy is going to rebuild that capability, with new destroyers currently being designed and expected to start entering the fleet around 2025. It is also planning to build new amphibious ships to increase that capability, also by the middle of the next decade. And there’s a current ongoing debate about building new aircraft carriers, though the first would not be ready until 2030 at the absolute earliest.
So rather than facing imminent collapse, the Russian Navy is going to continue to grow, but primarily with smaller ships coming in the short term, and larger ships entering the fleet no earlier than eight to ten years from now. What’s more, the new small ships will be well-armed, carrying the latest Oniks anti-ship missiles and Kalibr multi-purpose missiles, both of which can both be fired through universal vertical launch systems.
The Russian Navy’s primary mission has always been strategic deterrence and it will continue to have highly capable nuclear subs (both missile and attack subs) with new classes now entering service. The secondary mission will be coastal defense, very different from the US Navy’s focus on out-of-area deployment. But it will be highly capable in performing that mission, with small ships (corvettes and frigates) carrying advanced attack and defensive missiles.
While the Russian Navy has by no means given up on the out-of-area deployment mission, this is going to be a longer-term proposition, with construction of larger class ships (destroyers, aircraft carriers) dependent on the availability of financing in the long term. Furthermore, given their current capacities Russian shipyards are unlikely to be able to carry out the entire shipbuilding plan in the expected timelines. Even if the financing is available, the Russian Navy will not be able to deploy significant battle groups outside its immediate neighborhood for at least the next 10 years. In the short term, it will continue to deploy ships out-of-area, but mostly one or two at a time, not in a manner that would threaten the US Navy. And if the Russian Navy’s shipbuilding program is implemented in full, the Russian Navy could well be back as a full-fledged oceangoing force by the end of the next decade.
Dmitry Gorenburg is a senior research scientist in the Strategic Studies division of CNA, a not-for-profit research and analysis organization. Dr. Gorenburg is also the editor of the journals Problems of Post-Communism and Russian Politics and Law and an associate at Harvard University’s Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies. He has previously taught in the Department of Government at Harvard University and served as Executive Director of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (AAASS). He holds a Ph.D in political science from Harvard University and a B.A. in international relations from Princeton University. He blogs on issues related to the Russian military at http://russiamil.wordpress.com.
Tom 
James B. 
Jesus Gunn 
Anon E Moose 
Fred 
Jafo 
In matters such as these, it’s important to acknowledge the difference between what Russia plans, and what the Kremlin can actually deliver. The Russian military has repeatedly announced one improvement program or another, always with a proposed timeline, and they have regularly failed to bring those plans to fruition. At present, the Russian economy is also under serious pressure from a combination of sanctions and the impact of reduced energy prices relative to an economy which has not been sufficiently diversified. One of my postgraduate term papers involved researching the last six or eight years of Russian military affairs, and I was shocked at how much credibility the Russian military is given in the international press relative to the number of significant materiel and personnel shortfalls I was able to document through a variety of sources. The author is likely a more authoritative source on these issues than I, but I suspect that the truth is somewhere between his assertions and Mr. Axe’s. With respect to the author’s expectations for the Russian Navy’s medium term capabilities, I can only say that I’ll believe it when I see it.
Per the links on the three new classes of small Russian warships, it is taking 6-8 years to build rather small warships in relatively small numbers. There may be investment, but the Russian shipbuilding capability looks very weak.
Russian military equipment is built by Russians who love their country.
American military equipment is built by shareholders looking to make a profit.
you do the math.
Erm… built by Russians who love their country
And also love their Vodka, which is now plentiful and cheap, thanks to Putin.
What Could Go Wrong ?
“What could go wrong?”
A casual glance at history says “a lot.”
Axe’s piece is very much off the mark (e is usually very reliable) although he is broadly right about the heavier surface units – carriers, cursers and destroyers. The remaining vessels are ageing fast and while a few are being upgraded, there is little hope of modern replacements soon. However the submarine fleet is the priority and being modernised and receiving new vessels. The newest subs are close to matching NATO equivalents in terms of stealth and sophistication. There is also a rolling programme of corvettes and frigates and the Russian fleet received 47 vessels of various types in 2014. We are are sleepwalking into Cold War II and the overall threat of the Russian sub fleet is growing not diminishing while NATO’s ASW capability has declined drastically. See: http://www.savetheroyalnavy.org/britain-unprepared-for-the-naval-challenges-of-a-new-cold-war/
I will believe it when I see it. Hence, when was the last time the Russian Navy sailed a fleet around the World? The US Navy does this everyday and they have a fleet for ever ocean. Russia doesn’t have a blue water navy. I don’t care how many Peter the Greats you have, if you don’t have the logistics to sustain an operation outside of your own country, you don’t have a bona fide blue water navy. And the last time I checked, only the US Navy, Royal Navy, and French Navies have a blue water capability. Russia is decades away from being a threat to the US Navy is ever.
Either way, the US State of California has a bigger and better economy than Russia. Putin will end up bankrupting Russia with its military expenditures. Putin is stuck in the Soviet Union, and he even believes he can defeat Nato with a limited nuclear strike on a Nato country. This guy is a madman and a threat to peace. The best way to deal with Putin: Cold War 2!! That way the breadlines will start back up and the economy of Russia will collapse. Then Putin will have to answer to his people why he bankrupted Russia.
The neocons are a funny lot, aren’t they Jafo?
They enjoy a good belly laugh at the expense of the rusting Russian paper tiger. Then they suddenly realize they need a threat to distract Americans from their own failing economy and to justify their imperialism, so bray on they will at Putin and the growing Russian threat.